No Image Available
LinkedIn
Email
Pocket
Facebook
WhatsApp

UK employees ‘lack commitment’

pp_default1

UK employees are among the least committed to their jobs in the world, according to a new survey.

The research, ‘UK plc: leader or follower?’, published by International Survey Research, reports on the attitudes of over 360,000 employees from the world’s ten largest economies, and found that less than six out of ten British employees wanted to stay with their current employer or would recommend their current workplace as a good place to work.

According to the same study, Brazil has the highest level of employee commitment, with 79% of workers saying they were committed to their employer. Also registering highly were workers in Spain (76%), Germany (74%) and Canada (73%).

Only Japanese and Chinese workers registered as having less of a buy-in to their company aims and objectives, according to the study.

The research also found that good leadership from the top of the organisation was vital to securing the commitment of employees to an organisation, with quality of training and levels of empowerment available to individual employees also important factors. It also found a link to profitability, with companies with a high number of committed employees posting higher profit margins than those with few committed employees.

Commenting on the research, Roger Maitland, co-founder and Deputy Chairman of ISR, said: “Committed employees are more likely to stay with an organisation, go the extra mile for their company and put maximum effort into their work. The level of employee commitment has a major impact on an organisation’s profitability. Too often in the UK the people at the ‘bottom’ of organisations are alienated from those at the ‘top’. Employees see their leaders as lacking both the intellectual capital to craft aspirational goals, and the emotional intelligence necessary to achieve them.”

Want more insight like this? 

Get the best of people-focused HR content delivered to your inbox.

2 Responses

  1. re: Whom You Ask
    Fair enough. Does anyone know of a survey or surveys which points up an opposite trend to this? I think we should be told.

  2. Who you ask is important
    Only a brief note, these survey are all well and good as long as you keep things in perspective, if you asked 360,000 different people the same questions the trend could swing in a totally different direction. An example of a totally meaningless exercise in gathering statistics.

    Please try and convince me otherwise…

No Image Available