My organisation is running two separate systems of performance management. One for senior managers and one for the rest of the staff in the organisation.Senior managers rate themselves as well as by their bosses as high achievers while their employees are rated as under performers. I find this difficult to understand. Inspite of the fact that the organisation uses two different systems I want to believe that the net result or outcomes of both employees and senior managers should talk to each other.Employees cannot be under performers while senior managers are rated as high flyers.
I am on a learning curve I could be wrong.Please advise.