I haven’t come across an executive who is unaware that there is a culture at work within his or her organisation. I’ve met a few who haven’t made the link between culture and the performance of their business but the majority seem to understand that the two things are inextricably linked. I’m therefore surprised how often there’s no conscious, planned activity underway to shape their culture or continuing the theme from yesterday, to cultivate it.
So what’s the excuse in organisations where executives do understand the link but still don’t consciously and deliberately cultivate it? In my experience there are four key reasons:
This is a reflection of the human fear of change. We might not like our current circumstances but stay where we are because if we change it might be even worse. “Better the devil you know” and all that. It’s fear of losing control, of making things worse, fear of trying to change and failing, fear of succeeding and having a new set of problems, fear of the unknown. When fear is the dominant driver in the business it will be slow to change, slow to react to changes in the market – and at risk.
Organisations that have no burning platform for change are often complacent. Results will typically be ok, not great but also not poor enough to make change unavoidable. So the “we’ve always done it that way” and “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” mentality prevails. These organisations will be ‘comfortable’ places to work, but not great places that encourage and stimulate people to achieve more. These organisations are insular and not particularly concerned about what competitors are doing – and consequently are at risk. See Kodak for an example.
When the senior team in an organisation gets too comfortable and habitual ways of managing become embedded, it becomes difficult for leaders to step outside their comfort zone and drive change. It becomes in the best interests of the leadership team to safeguard the status quo – because the alternative would mean them changing. Decisions are communicated and if challenged, explained by suffixing “because the Chairman / CEO says so”. Leaders in these organisations might be perceived as arrogant and disinterested in change – and are therefore at risk.
Some organisations know they should change their culture, they just don’t know how to do it. They perhaps can’t put their finger on what’s wrong currently, and consequently they don’t know exactly what needs to change, and even if they do they don’t know what actions to take to do it or how long it will take, how employees will react, or who needs to do what. These organisations desire change and are ambitious but don’t know where to start and so stress is part and parcel of working there, because it’s hard work overcoming the difficulties inherent in the culture. They experience other organisations doing what they do ……better – and so they are at risk.
LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/timhadfield