No Image Available
LinkedIn
Email
Pocket
Facebook
WhatsApp

Training Trends 2004: Attitudes to training

pp_default1

Trainer

Organisations’ attitudes to training and development are getting better, but there is still room for improvement, according to the Training Trends 2004 survey.

The survey of Training Zone and HR Zone members found that while 72% described their organisation’s attitude to training as generally positive, almost half went on to say that their company’s good intentions did not match up to reality.

And just 23% said that training and development was an integral part of company strategy.

There were also signs that there would be an increased need for training professionals to make the business case for training.

Over a third of respondents expected return on investment to more important for them in the coming year.

Evaluation is also becoming a bigger issue for 59% of you.

Almost all – 98% – carry out evaluation, with the feedback form being the most popular method.

Training Zone user panel member Jason Woodford, Development Director at Academy Internet called the findings “encouraging”.

However, he added: “Aligning training resources to business needs is a core principal of the Investor in People model and essential to the credibility of the training function in business.

“In its apparent absence, it can be a valuable role for providers to help their customers to develop and communicate the business case to budget holders. Those that do might find their phone ringing more frequently over the coming year!”

Training Trends 2004: Predictions of Increased Demand will be published on Wednesday, 12 May.

Results in Brief


Your organisation’s attitude to training

  • 72% said their company had a positive attitude to training.

  • 23% said that training and development was an integral part of company strategy.

  • 10% of organisations only sent staff on training programmes if legislation demanded it.

  • Asked how closely your organisation’s training and development policy fitted with what actually happens:

  • 42% said their organisation did what it said it would do.

  • 9% felt it did more than it said it would, however.

  • 49% said that their organisation had lots of good intentions but these didn’t match up with reality.

  • Time for Staff Development

  • 40% offer three-five days.

  • 23% offer six-10 days.

  • 17% allocate more than 10 days.

  • 14% said they offered one-two days per year.

  • Responsibility for Training

  • 40% said this rested with the line manager.

  • 21% said this was with the training department.

  • 17% said the individual him/herself was responsible.

  • Evaluating Training

  • 59% said evaluation was becoming more important.

  • The feedback form is still the most common method of evaluation, with 27% using this method.

  • 11% followed up how learning had been put into action after three months.

  • Just 2% did not evaluate training at all.
  • Want more insight like this? 

    Get the best of people-focused HR content delivered to your inbox.
    No Image Available