Author Profile Picture

Kirsten Buck

PTHR

Chief Futures Officer

LinkedIn
Email
Pocket
WhatsApp
Reddit
Print

Polymorphic organisations: The next evolution of people-centric design

What if your company could shift shape as quickly as the world around it? Here, Perry Timms and Kirsten Buck of PTHR introduce the polymorphic organisation – a living system that adapts to multiple forms based on context – and why HR's role must evolve from maintaining order to orchestrating continuous transformation.

The landscape of work continues to change at an accelerated rate under the combined forces of technology, social change, and sustainability demands. In this moment, HR leaders face a defining question: how can we design organisations capable of evolving at the same pace as the world around them?

For decades, our operating models have relied on predictability – stable structures, clear hierarchies, and standardised roles. But those design logics are struggling to keep up. There is an emerging answer to this challenge and complexity. It is not a new hierarchy or another reorg though. It is a new philosophy: the polymorphic organisation.

What is a polymorphic organisation? 

Polymorphic organisations are built for continuous transformation. They don’t adhere to one structure or leadership logic; instead, they blend and adapt multiple forms depending on context. In regulated environments, they might retain functional clarity. In innovation or transformation spaces, they operate through self-managed, networked teams.

This flexibility embodies the essence of polymorphism, which is literally defined as “many forms.” It’s an organisational capability to change shape deliberately, not reactively. It acknowledges that structure is a means, not an end: a living system that adjusts form and energy in line with purpose and demand.

If polymorphic organisations had a pop culture manifestation, it would be a team of Transformers; Optimus Prime as the original polymorphic structure! 

This concept doesn’t operate from one dominant model. It uses multiple logics that are layered, adaptive and dynamic. This might be seen as a profound shift for HR, which has historically been both guardian and product of structural orthodoxy.

The dual reality: legacy and future operations

The term “polymorphic” comes from the world of object-oriented design/programming. Within this field, the computer scientist Alan J. Perlis said: “Program for the present, for the future”. 

Nowadays, senior HR leaders are managing dual systems: the legacy organisation (optimised for consistency) and the future organisation (optimised for adaptability). Both exist simultaneously, creating friction, but also opportunity.

Schrödinger’s Hierarchy – an organisational paradox in which hierarchies are both alive and obsolete – still exists within a state of polymorphism. But the real work increasingly flows through networks, digital platforms, and agile ecosystems. The challenge for HR is to help organisations navigate this duality, sustaining what still creates value while intentionally designing for what comes next. There’s an oscillation between legacy and future.

This tension is precisely why polymorphism matters now more than ever. Economic volatility, AI integration, and workforce mobility are demanding responsiveness at a level traditional models can’t sustain. The HR function’s role, therefore, must evolve from maintaining order to orchestrating fluidity. You could say that HR is the playmaker in the most complex game of chess on display; where AI as a player is bringing new tactics not yet seen.

Work as spaces, not structures

A key shift underpinning polymorphism is a redefinition of work itself – from functions to spaces.

Work no longer happens neatly within departments. It flows through interconnected value spaces, such as inclusion, innovation, customer experience, or capability development. Spaces where people, technology, and purpose combine around outcomes rather than job titles.

This reorientation challenges HR’s familiar building blocks: job descriptions, reporting lines, even “departments.” Instead, it invites us to view talent, learning, and collaboration as part of a living system of purposeful interaction.

Something that can be overlooked or not considered is that a customer doesn’t experience your org chart, they experience your value chain. The polymorphic model reimagines that value chain as a networked system of spaces – adaptive, cross-boundary, and inherently human. 

Coherence over control

Traditional organisations relied on control mechanisms: layers of approval, fixed roles, and detailed policies. Polymorphic organisations rely instead on coherence: shared understanding, trust, and rhythm.

This coherence is sustained through what we interpret as Flywheels of Organisational Effectiveness: aligned purpose, empowered teams, real-time intelligence, and continuous learning. These flywheels replace static governance with dynamic momentum fit for the mid-21st-century organisation.

For HR, this means building systems of rhythm rather than rules! Within this rhythm are performance cycles that reinforce learning, talent processes that flex across boundaries, and leadership development that cultivates adaptability rather than authority.

The HR 3.0 imperative

In a polymorphic world, HR itself must evolve. In Perry Timms’s newest book, The HR Operating Model, Timms frames this as HR 3.0. This frame sees a discipline that is more deliberate, diversified, and dynamic than ever. It integrates human and machine capabilities, orchestrates networks instead of departments, and measures impact through outcomes, not outputs.

This transformation requires HR leaders to expand their focus beyond structure into system design, the art of enabling coherence, culture, and capability flow. It also demands new thinking about proficiency: not just the presence of skills, but the quality of their deployment across changing contexts.

In short, HR 3.0 becomes the architect of adaptability. It helps organisations sense, respond, and reconfigure, continually.

Why now?

The urgency for polymorphism is incomparable to any other period that has come before us. Disruption is no longer episodic – it’s ambient. From generative AI to demographic shifts, the parameters of performance are being redrawn in real time.

As renowned Economist Deming observed, “The business that survives is one which has a system that anticipates the future.” Anticipation requires flexibility at both the structural and human levels. Polymorphic organisations deliver precisely that: the ability to change form without losing purpose.

The next era of HR leadership, then, is not about maintaining the old equilibrium. It’s about designing systems that thrive in motion.

Towards a living system

The polymorphic organisation is not an abstract theory – it’s a design for human sustainability. It allows structure to serve purpose, not the other way around. It creates room for creativity, connection, and responsiveness. And it re-centres HR’s mission: to ensure that people and performance evolve together.

As systems thinker Russell Ackoff wrote, “To manage a system effectively, you must focus on the interactions of the parts, not the actions of the parts taken separately.”

In a world where everything is interacting, the organisations that flourish will be those that flow. Those that are dynamic, deliberate, and deeply human. Dare we propose that the age of the polymorphic organisation has begun…

Want more insight like this? 

Get the best of people-focused HR content delivered to your inbox.
Author Profile Picture
Kirsten Buck

Chief Futures Officer

Read more from Kirsten Buck