Author Profile Picture

Maddy Christopher

HRZone

Deputy Editor

Read more about Maddy Christopher

LinkedIn
Email
Pocket
Facebook
WhatsApp

Employment tribunal rules Apple employee unfairly dismissed

An employment tribunal has found Apple’s investigation to have significant deficiencies and has found it to have unfairly dismissed an employee over racial allegations and insensitive photos.
silhouette of people standing near wall: Apple

In a recent tribunal ruling, an Apple Store employee was found to have been unfairly dismissed over allegations of making racially insensitive remarks and taking unauthorised photos of a colleague. 

The tribunal criticised Apple Retail UK’s investigation process, highlighting the non-existent zero-tolerance policy cited during the employee’s dismissal. This case underscores the importance of clear and consistent disciplinary policies within organisations.

The case involves Jeffries, a former “genius” at an Apple Store in London. Jeffries was dismissed in February 2023 following two incidents. The first occurred on December 13, 2022, when he jokingly told a Chinese colleague, “As long as you lot don’t release another deadly disease on the world,” referencing COVID-19. 

The colleague, Ms. Liu, did not file a complaint, but another colleague, Mr. Webster, reported feeling Liu looked shocked. The second incident involved a comment suggesting a colleague would succeed in a promotion if he identified as Jamaican or Asian.

Apple’s eagle-eye

Apple’s investigation, led by a senior manager from the Regent Street store, faced significant scrutiny. The tribunal found the investigation lacked clarity, failed to properly inform Jeffries of the allegations, and relied on a zero-tolerance policy that did not exist. 

Liu herself stated she was not offended by Jeffries’ comments, further complicating the rationale for dismissal.

At the disciplinary hearing, Apple Store leader Mr. Pegram reiterated the non-existent zero-tolerance policy, leading to Jeffries’ dismissal. 

The appeal process, handled by Ms. Shapland, also faced criticism for its superficial treatment and failure to address the investigation’s deficiencies. The tribunal concluded the dismissal was outside the realm of reasonable responses, declaring it unfair.

Guidance on disciplinary actions

This case offers several lessons for HR professionals:

  1. Clear policies and communication: Ensure all disciplinary policies, including zero-tolerance measures, are clearly documented and communicated to employees. Undefined or assumed policies can lead to legal challenges and unfair dismissal claims.
  2. Thorough investigations: Conduct comprehensive and unbiased investigations into misconduct allegations. Ensure the accused is fully informed of the allegations and given a fair chance to respond. Documentation of all steps taken during the investigation is crucial.
  3. Consistency in disciplinary actions: Apply disciplinary policies consistently across all employees. Any deviation can be viewed as discrimination or unfair treatment. Regular training for managers on handling disciplinary issues can promote consistency.
  4. Transparent appeals process: Establish a transparent and robust appeals process. Appeal handlers should be trained to critically evaluate the original investigation and disciplinary decision. This helps in rectifying any procedural errors and maintaining fairness.
  5. Cultural sensitivity training: Provide ongoing cultural sensitivity and diversity training. This can help prevent insensitive remarks and foster a more inclusive workplace environment. Encourage open dialogue about cultural issues to build a respectful and understanding workplace.
  6. Documentation and record-keeping: Maintain detailed records of all disciplinary actions, investigations, and appeal processes. These records can be critical in defending against unfair dismissal claims and demonstrating that proper procedures were followed.

Want more insight like this? 

Get the best of people-focused HR content delivered to your inbox.
Author Profile Picture
Maddy Christopher

Deputy Editor

Read more from Maddy Christopher