Cricket, it’s all so lovely, endless cream teas, the glorious sound of leather on willow, what more could you want? Editor’s Comment, urges bosses to relax a little.
An indifferent attitude to the quintessential game just doesn’t cut it this summer. You can’t but fail to notice the hype that surrounds it. The papers are lapping it up – the Telegraph even dedicated its front page to the rather unimpressive, brown urn kept at Lord’s yesterday and we haven’t even reached a conclusion yet.
And it has certainly provided a welcome break from the doom and gloom and tragedy of the New Orleans disaster and the humiliating football defeat by Northern Ireland.
The cricketers’ wives have even found a place in our hearts, less Posh bling more your denim jacket wearing, shop at John Lewis brigade. We like them, we could even be them. They’re just ordinary women, juggling careers and motherhood.
Free from the oppressive media attention that the footballers’ wives get caught up in and not so wedged as to make their weekly income sound depressingly unobtainable.
The Ashes has captured the imagination of the nation and not just the sporting half. Like Willa Wonka’s chocolate bars and Big Brother we’re obsessed, we’ve fallen for it hook, line and sinker.
But what does all this mean for UK plc? Peninsula, employment firm, tested the waters by quizzing 603 employers and 612 employees. The results are as follows:
- 87% of employers are allowing workers to follow the cricket in the workplace
- 79% of bosses claim England’s success may even lead to greater morale and productivity
- 88% of bosses believe allowing workers to follow England at work has led to reduced absenteeism
And interestingly, 74% of workers claim to have had no interest in cricket at all until this summer.
Peter Done, Managing Director of Peninsula commented: “Many employers in the past have seen sporting events as an irritating distraction to workers and coincide with employees skiving. However this summer with the London Olympic success and now the Ashes, employers are taking a more practical approach and have relaxed their attitudes for which they are reaping the rewards.
“Workers morale and in turn productivity has improved due to a general feel good factor being created around the country stemming from the field of play. Allowing workers to follow the game through the radio or television in the background has resulted in less ‘sickies’ being thrown by workers intent on following the game.”
Furthermore says Done, “The spirit, interaction and mutual respect between opposition players and officials alike is a good role model for workers and businesses. Demonstrating how successful communication and determination can help build bonds towards a common collective goal.”
The parallels between football and cricket have been much touted in the press, and you only have to have witnessed and winced at Rooney’s teenage behaviour on the pitch this week to agree. Cricket really is a gentleman’s game.
So perhaps there is something to be learned from this relaxed, general bonhomie. The Ozzie opposition certainly seem to mix work and play in a more balanced manner – more shrimps on the barbie then late nights in the office, I think.
We’re told time and time again that rising absence levels are making a big hole in UK Plc’s pocket. If bosses can learn just to give a little then the flexibility will surely pay dividends.
It must be better than having workers swapping a day (unauthorised) in the office for one in front of the box. What Done talks about in terms of a ‘feel good’ factor can’t be a bad thing either.
When Marie Antoinette, famously and rather insensitively said to her starving population, “Let them eat cake,” she had a point, albeit with a rather twisted irony. Give them what they want, if only she had worked out it was bread.
If bosses can relax a little then they’ll find workers will return the favour threefold, in terms of productivity, loyalty and general good naturedness – surely that’s got to be a good thing? Something your management book may not point out.
I’d like to hear your views, should employees be allowed to tune in or watch the cricket coverage whilst at work?
More Editor’s Comments
- The bitter pill – trading across borders
- Can a leopard change its spots?
- Seeing is believing
- Why is HR always the first to go?
- The new rules of engagement
- Feeling a little off colour?
- The salvation of Investors in People
- Silencing the Levi ‘luvvies’
- Hiding behind the arras
- The recruitment catwalk
- Doughnuts, Dementors and Daring!
- Plastic fantastic
- Laissez faire … the best option?
- Innovate or fail?
- Under control?
- Sugar … I’m fired!
- Living to work or working to live?
- Can workplaces survive without leaders?
- Leadership the Ramsay way
- ‘Job-hopping’ – does HR care?
- Budget 2005 – High fives from HR?
- The Vox Pop of Volunteerism
- Tipping the balance on race equality
- Reward – the cash-cow
- Finding love in the concrete jungle
- The Darwinism of Trade Unions
- ‘Fat’ attacks UK plc
- Bricks and mortar trap workers
- Lighting the torch for jobs creation in 2012
- Forty winks in 2005?
- 2004 the HR Year in Review
- Ditch the bah humbug!
- The folly of ‘presenteeism
- Did Brown forget the demographics?
- Fashion bites – the rise of dress ‘down’ Friday
- Raising the game to woo parent voters
- Stress in the 21st century
- Reflections on the CIPD annual conference 2004
- Campaigners fired up for UK smoking ban
- Beating the pension time bomb
- Can Royal Mail rise above the taunts?
- The changing face of conflict at work
- HR – ‘big hat no cattle’?
- Are more bank holidays the answer?
- Working the reward schemes
- ‘Compensation culture’ – fact or fiction?