No Image Available

Over-50s ‘don’t give returns on training investment’

pp_default1

Over 50s, particularly females, are more likely to miss out on training opportunities in the workplace than younger male employees because HR managers see older women as offering a poor return on investment.

That was the result of research carried out into age and gender bias in the allocation of training and development budgets by Almuth McDowall from Surrey University.

Working with HR managers in 48 companies, Dr McDowall used a series of fictional vignettes to test out their decision making when allocating funding for training and development.

All of the managers were experienced with an average of ten years’ practice in the field of making training and development decisions.

Each manager was given four scenarios consisting of character profiles of both young people aged 30 or younger and older employees aged 50 or more. There was a careful mix of gender and ethnicity worked into the study.

They were then asked to work with the scenario to allocate a notional budget of £6,000 across four employees and justify their decisions.

The outcome mirrored the contrasting amount of training made available to older women and younger men in the UK, with the characters in the scenarios who were female and over 50 receiving far less of the available budget than younger male characters.

When quizzed about their reasons for this difference, the HR managers justified their decisions in terms of older employees and women being less ‘investment-worthy’ perceiving them to offer a lower return on investment.

Dr McDowall said: “We are looking forward to sharing our initial findings with the HR community as it’s essential they know these biases are real.

“With legislation now having a bearing on age discrimination in the workplace HR managers have to be aware that even though they say they don’t want to be ageist, as many in our study did, there may be subliminal factors which mean they place the training and development interests of older workers and female workers last.”

One Response

  1. older people give a better return…
    This is an interesting posting yet shows the lack of awareness of HR and strategic thinking.
    Having looked through retention stats and surveys it appears that the typical retention time for an employee is 4-6 years. In older recruits it is longer. With younger people retention is less, 2-4 years.
    Think about it, if someone is 55-60 and changing job (assuming they are not a 12 month job hopper) they will aim to stay till retirement. So investing in training of the older workforce is in fact a better return.
    So while this makes good business sense AND with current legislation discrimination is not allowed, this article potentially damaging to the professionalism of HR. If as HR we get this wrong what is the message we are giving to the managers in our organisations?

No Image Available
Newsletter

Get the latest from HRZone

Subscribe to expert insights on how to create a better workplace for both your business and its people.

 

Thank you.

Processing...
Thank you! Your subscription has been confirmed. You'll hear from us soon.
ErrorHere