HR Zone member Sandra Beale advises on how organisations can best handle a relocation of offices so that all runs smoothly and employee motivation and productivity stays in tact.
In today’s competitive age many companies seek to cut costs to improve profits, which is linked to business strategy. One way of reducing overheads is to relocate company offices.
Sometimes this can be within the UK, involving moving staff a few miles away to offices with reduced costs, or even a few hundred miles to a part of the country where property prices or leases and business rates are cheaper.
In drastic instances, companies may choose to re-locate overseas, either in part or completely, to take advantage of a cheaper labour force, as have many bank call centres in recent years.
When relocating, there are many decisions a company must make, and to ensure things run smoothly the process must be well planned and coordinated.
In-house or outsourced?
Perhaps the first decision to be made is whether to coordinate the relocation in-house, often heavily using the HR department, or whether to bring in a specialist consultant. There are advantages and disadvantages for both.
Using the HR department is the cheapest option, however the administration involved adds to what is probably an already heavy burden. If using a consultant, the process can be outsourced, however, there is the consultancy cost which can often be quite high.
If using a consultant, clear objectives need to be set for the project and the consultant needs to keep the company regularly informed as to progress. The consultant can be used as much or as little is required, from choosing the site of the new premises to consulting with the workforce.
Depending on the distance the company wishes to relocate to, the need to make redundancies may sometimes be avoided. Companies can use a mobility clause in employment contracts, which allows the freedom and flexibility to move staff without legal repercussions within a reasonable travelling distance of their existing office base.
However, if the company is relocating several hundred miles away, a redundancy situation will arise and needs to be managed accordingly. The company needs to identify which key staff they need to retain within the business and create an attractive relocation package accordingly to gain the commitment of the employees involved.
Communication is key
Whatever the relocation situation, the company needs to keep the workforce fully informed with what is happening so communication is key. There can be several ways of communicating progress to staff – via group or team announcements cascaded down from senior management; or via newsletter, noticeboard announcements or individual emails.
During a relocation exercise, employees will be nervous as to what is happening with lots of speculation so it is best to keep them informed to reduce any anxiety and stress.
Speed is quite critical and the project needs to be kept moving along at a decent pace, but preventing any mishaps along the way, for example, forgetting to order new furniture.
A project that moves too slowly can create low productivity amongst the staff whilst they wait for something to happen. As mentioned, this comes down to key planning in the early stages.
The employees often like to be involved in the process and it is good for the company to get buy in from the staff as to what is ultimately achieved. By incorporating visits to the new offices so that employees can even choose where they sit in their part of the new building can often improve employee relations.
For those employees who are relocating with the company several hundred miles away, it is often a good idea for the company to provide information on the locality, for instance schools and estate agencies, with possible paid time off to research the possibilities.
For more information, please email Sandra Beale at info@sjbealehrconsult.co.uk or phone 07762 771290.
2 Responses
Mobility Clause
I am not sure that I agree with the legal advice. Having a mobility clause in a contract allows flexibility, however, it needs to be used reasonably. I would say that 20 minutes extra travelling time is reasonable. If it were 2 hours that would be different.
In the place of work clause in contracts employers can also gain flexibilty by stating the usual place of work but adding that employees may be required to work in other locations as deemed necessary by the employer.
Sandra Beale FCIPD
Death of the Mobility Clause?
I have a colleauge who is currently relocating one group of people from HQ to another site 20 minutes away.
The legal advice she was given was that despite having a mobility clasue the relocation would be deemed to be a redundancy situation because the place of work will be changing. As some have been based a HQ for nearly 20 years then custom and practice would say their base is HQ despite the mobility clause. I would be interested in your opinion on this.